Georgia Tech Procurement Assistance Center

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Training
    • Class Registration
    • On-demand Training
    • GTPAC COVID-19 Resource Page
    • Cybersecurity
    • Veterans Verification Video
    • GTPAC Community
    • Other Training Audio & Video
  • Useful Links
  • Team Directory
    • Albany Counselor
    • Atlanta Counselors
    • Augusta Counselor
    • Carrollton Counselor
    • Columbus Counselor
    • Gainesville Counselor
    • Savannah Counselor
    • Warner Robins Counselor
  • Directions
    • Atlanta – Training Facility
    • Atlanta – Office
    • Albany
    • Augusta
    • Carrollton
    • Columbus
    • Gainesville
    • Savannah
    • Warner Robins
  • COVID-19
  • New Client Application
  • Contact Us

Military helmet manufacturer must pay $3 million to settle False Claims Act violations

March 11, 2016 By Andrew Smith

In 2010, the Army recalled 44,000 Advanced Combat Helmets that were issued to soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan when independent tests showed the helmets did not meet Army standards.
In 2010, the Army recalled 44,000 Advanced Combat Helmets that were issued to soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan when independent tests showed the helmets did not meet Army standards.

A manufacturer of ballistic helmets for military and law enforcement personnel worldwide has agreed to pay $3 million to resolve False Claims Act allegations.  The case involves Ohio-based ArmorSource, LLC  in connection with a contract to provide combat helmets to the U.S. Army.

Background

In 2006, the Army contracted with ArmorSource to manufacture the Advanced Combat Helmet (ACH) for use by soldiers in combat.  ACH helmets are made of Kevlar, an armored material, and are worn to provide ballistic protection for the soldier.  From 2006 to 2009, ArmorSource delivered ACH helmets to the Army.  Whistleblowers working for ArmorSource’s subcontractor alleged that the helmets were manufactured and tested using methods that did not conform to contract requirements and that failed to meet contract performance standards.  In May 2010, the Army began recalling the helmets after several lots failed ballistic safety tests.

The Complaint

ArmorSource subcontracted the manufacturing to Federal Prison Industries, Inc., which operates under the trade name UNICOR.  The settlement of this complaint resolves a lawsuit filed by whistleblowers Melessa Ponzio and Sharon Clubb, both UNICOR employees, under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The Act permits private individuals to sue on behalf of the government those who falsely claim federal funds and to receive a share of any recovery.  Ms. Ponzio and Ms. Clubb will share $450,000.

The Justice Department’s Position

The March 7, 2016 settlement reflects the Justice Department’s commitment to ensuring military personnel receive products that meet technical  requirements and for which the government has paid.  “The U.S. government relies on contractors to manufacture equipment that is critical to the safety of our men and women in uniform, and equipment that fails to meet performance standards not only cheats taxpayers, but can put lives at risk,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division.

“Today’s settlement in this important case is a reminder to all government contractors that they must deliver on their promises, especially when the safety and security of our troops is on the line,” said Special Agent in Charge Monte A. Cason of the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General’s Dallas Field Office.

“Not conforming to contract requirements, failing to meet performance standards, and failing to pass ballistic safety tests for the helmets that protect the very heads and lives of our young men and women who serve this nation is incredibly unconscionable,” said Director Frank Robey of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Commands Major Procurement.

This settlement was the result of a coordinated effort among the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Texas. The investigation was conducted by the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General, the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General’s Defense Criminal Investigative Service and the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, Major Procurement Fraud Unit.

The case is captioned U.S. ex rel. Ponzio, et al. v. Rabintex Industries Ltd., et al., Case No. 1:10-CV-588 (E.D. Tex.).  The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

Source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/defense-contractor-armorsource-llc-agrees-pay-3-million-settle-false-claims-act-allegations

Filed Under: Contracting News Tagged With: Army, DOJ, false claims, False Claims Act, helmet, Justice Dept., qui tam, Unicor, whistleblower

Factory owners: Federal prisoners stealing our business

August 16, 2012 By ei2admin

Just hearing the word Unicor is enough to make Kurt Wilson see red.

Unicor is a government-run enterprise that employs over 13,000 inmates — at wages as low as 23 cents an hour — to make goods for the Pentagon and other federal agencies.

With some exceptions, Unicor gets first dibs on federal contracts over private companies as long as its bid is comparable in price, quantity and delivery. In other words: If Unicor wants a contract, it gets it.

Keep reading this article at: http://money.cnn.com/2012/08/14/smallbusiness/federal-prison-business/index.html?hpt=hp_t3.

Filed Under: Contracting News Tagged With: manufacturing, Prison Industries, Unicor

Recent Posts

  • Podcast: Buy American executive order and recent changes
  • Podcast: Contractors say they’re seeing a resurgence of LPTA procurements
  • Reminder: If pricing is too high, VA “rule of two” might not apply
  • CPARS challenges: No appeals without contracting officer claim
  • GAO: In “best value” procurement agency has wide discretion to pay price premium

Popular Topics

8(a) abuse Army bid protest budget budget cuts certification construction contract awards contracting opportunities cybersecurity DoD DOJ False Claims Act FAR federal contracting federal contracts fraud GAO Georgia Tech government contracting government contract training government trends GSA GSA Schedule GTPAC HUBZone innovation IT Justice Dept. marketing NDAA OMB SBA SDVOSB set-aside small business small business goals spending subcontracting technology VA veteran owned business VOSB wosb

Contracting News

Podcast: Contractors say they’re seeing a resurgence of LPTA procurements

CPARS challenges: No appeals without contracting officer claim

GAO: In “best value” procurement agency has wide discretion to pay price premium

Contractor settles fraud claims related to 8(a) joint venture

Senator: Pandemic makes anti-fraud law more important than ever

Read More

Contracting Tips

Podcast: Buy American executive order and recent changes

Reminder: If pricing is too high, VA “rule of two” might not apply

Startups should try to win city and school district contracts. Here’s why.

Surviving proposal weaknesses after discussions: what not to do

E-Verify records purge scheduled for May 14, 2021

Read More

GTPAC News

DLA hosting event March 10th with special emphasis on Women-Owned Small Businesses

Navy Office of Small Business Programs holding three events in March

SBA hosting conversations with contracting officers forum Feb. 25th

USACE seeks vaccination center construction support

GTPAC updates cybersecurity resource page to include CMMC guidance

Read More

Georgia Tech News

Future of 5G is under the microscope at Georgia incubator

Collective worm and robot “blobs” protect individuals, swarm together

The Partnership for Inclusive Innovation is now accepting applications for pilot programs

Georgia Tech will help manage DOE’s Savannah River National Laboratory

Dr. Abdallah testifies on U.S. competitiveness, research, STEM pipeline at Congressional hearing

Read More

  • SAM.gov registration is free, and help with SAM is free, too
APTAC RSS Twitter GTPAC - 30th Year of Service

Copyright © 2021 · Georgia Tech - Enterprise Innovation Institute