Georgia Tech Procurement Assistance Center

Supplier diversity: untapped resource for construction companies

By

An effective supplier diversity program can provide multiple benefits for construction companies, including enhanced innovation, profitability, and the ability to attract and retain qualified minority and female employees.

The federal government, state government agencies, and even local governments require companies that do business with them to adopt and implement supplier diversity programs.  Many government contracts impose specific levels of contracting with diverse businesses as a contract requirement.

The definitions of “diverse business” vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and many of the acronyms and names commonly used (e.g., Disadvantaged Business Enterprise or DBE) can have different meanings, depending on the laws and regulations applicable to the specific contracts.  Therefore, contractors must perform due diligence on the supplier diversity requirements whenever they submit a bid or proposal for a government contract.

A growing number of non-governmental owners mandate diverse supplier participation in their projects.  The “Billion Dollar Roundtable” is a group of major U.S. companies that have pledged to spend a minimum of $1 billion a year with diverse suppliers.  Due to their large dollar value, construction projects are a key component of these efforts.  As of May 31, 2019, the Roundtable has 27 members, including some of the biggest companies:  Apple, Boeing, Exelon, and Walmart.  Other companies are following this example.

Continue reading at:  National Law Review

Camden County’s development authority to host event for prospective submarine suppliers

By

A submarine supplier recruitment event will be held May 1 and 2, 2019 at the Jekyll Island Convention Center.

The conference is being hosted by the Camden County Joint Development Authority and sponsored by the Submarine Industrial Base Council (SIBC) which represents 5,000 companies in nearly all 50 States producing components used to manufacture two Virginia-class attack submarines per year.

Suppliers who are interested in learning more about opportunities associated with the upcoming construction of the Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine are encouraged to attend.

This event is particularly appropriate for:

  • Established manufacturing companies in the Southeastern region with experience fulfilling Department of Defense (DoD) contracts for Mil-Spec manufactured components.
  • Established companies without DoD contract experience are also encouraged to attend in order to learn how to become a sub tier supplier to a SIBC supplier and expand the market share for your products.

Features of the supplier conference include a panel session featuring representatives from General Dynamics-Electric Boat and Huntington Ingalls Industries-Newport News Shipbuilding and a panel consisting of several existing SIBC suppliers in the Southeast Region.  Each panel will discuss the unique requirements and challenges potential suppliers will face and the process to become a component supplier.

Complete details, including registration, can be found at: https://spark.adobe.com/page/ezcqkBTaqfhff/

Defense contractors begin early shutdown preparations

By

Contractors should immediately begin communicating with their contracting officers about the impacts of a potential government shutdown this fall, former executive branch officials and industry experts warned on Monday.

Already, said David Berteau, who served for 14 years at the Defense Department before becoming president of the Professional Services Council, the contracting community is “way ahead” of where the government is in terms of shutdown preparation. Still, he and other experts cautioned, companies should develop and maintain good relationships with civil servants now so they can solicit information from them as a potential appropriations lapse draws closer.

Agencies will be forced to shutter their doors on Oct. 1 — or, more realistically, Oct. 2, which is a Monday — if Congress fails to pass a spending bill to set agency funding for fiscal 2018. Representatives from business contracting with government gathered at PSC’s headquarters in Arlington, Va., on Aug. 14th to hear tips and advice for how they should prepare for such an outcome.

Keep reading this article at: http://www.defenseone.com/politics/2017/08/defense-contractors-begin-early-shutdown-preparations/140268/

What to expect as the curtain comes down on federal fiscal year 2017

By

Government Product News asked Chuck Schadl for his take on government selling opportunities as the federal fiscal year draws to a close on Sept. 30. Schadl is Group Manager for Government Contracting Services at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Here are his views.

The federal government’s year-end spending sprees are legendary as agencies try to commit contracting dollars – lest they have to turn their leftover budgets back to the U.S. Treasury.

A study conducted last year, however, shows that spending just before September 30 seems to be trending downward, with more attention being given to better planning the spend that begins anew on October 1.

The study, “Positioning for 2017: Competitive Outlook in Defense and Civilian Agencies,”shows that for the past two years both defense and civilian agencies have softened their year-end spending spike. Big data and analytics firm Govini conducted the research.

That said, there’s still a disproportionate amount of contract dollars obligated in the fourth quarter of the federal fiscal year – at least 30 percent.

What can vendors do now to perhaps capture year-end money, as well as set the stage for the new fiscal year?

Keep reading this article at: http://americancityandcounty.com/federal/what-expect-curtain-comes-down-federal-fiscal-year-2017

Supply company owner pleads guilty to $1 million fraud scheme

By

The owner of three fraudulent commercial supply companies has pled guilty to cheating approximately 40 subcontractors out of more than $1 million.

From February 2010 through August 2015, Keith B. Fisher Sr. of Philadelphia used FedBid.com to submit quotes and offers for his companies KLA International Inc., Quad Trade Services Inc. and TCI Technologies. After winning federal contracts, Fisher and his associates would subcontract third-party vendors to provide goods to government agencies with the intention to not pay or only pay nominal amounts to the 40 victim vendors.

Keep reading this article at: http://www.federaltimes.com/http:/www.federaltimes.com/articles/supply-company-owner-pleads-guilty-to-1m-fraud-scheme

Putting the defense industry at the Defense table

By

Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Jack Reed (D-RI), the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), recently held a series of very important hearings regarding the need to make fundamental changes to the structure and substance of defense management.

risk aversionAmong those who were called to testify were Arnold Punaro, an influential defense expert who once served as the SASC staff director; Norman Augustine, the widely respected former chairman and CEO of Lockheed Martin Corporation; Dr. Jacques Gansler, a former under secretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics; and Michele Flournoy, a former under secretary of defense for policy.

Punaro had numerous observations and suggestions about the need to reduce the Defense Department’s infrastructure and overall overhead, while Augustine and Gansler spoke eloquently about the enduring problems facing the defense industrial base — many the inevitable result of defense acquisition policies that discourage new companies from entering the defense marketplace while simultaneously encouraging many in it to exit, as recently seen in the decision of United Technologies to divest its Sikorsky Helicopter unit.

But, perhaps the most significant observation regarding acquisition came from Flournoy, the former Pentagon policy chief, who noted that it was important that “the federal acquisition regulation (FAR) is not used as a means to prevent industry from being at the table to suggest solutions and inform the debate about what is technologically possible.”

Keep reading this article at: http://www.afcea.org/content/?q=Blog-putting-defense-industry-defense-table

Why DHS causes more headaches for industry than any other agency

By

A culture of fear and lack of consistency at the Homeland Security Department (DHS) are perpetuating a fractured relationship with some members of industry, who said they are less enthusiastic about working with DHS than they are with other federal agencies.

“The fact that people don’t want to do business with us is a big problem for me,” Russell Deyo, DHS undersecretary for management, said Nov. 9 at the Homeland Security and Defense Business Council’s DHS Enterprise symposium in Washington. “And I need to understand why and what we can do about it.”

Deyo, who spent nearly three decades at Johnson & Johnson, presented his four management priorities for the final year of the Obama administration before a group of industry executives.

But the conversation that followed quickly took a turn, when one member of industry suggested DHS approach its vendor relationship with more urgency.

Keep reading this article at: http://federalnewsradio.com/industryassociations/2015/11/dhs-causes-headaches-industry-agency/

Relationships key to successful year-end spending

By

A mix of budget uncertainty and the use-it-or-lose-it nature of federal funding leads to a spending rush at the end of the fiscal year at many agencies. The realities of the contracting process and stipulations under the federal acquisition regulation can make this a daunting time for vendors and contracting shops, alike.

GSA logoDuring a panel discussion at the annual 930Gov end-of-year conference, Casey Kelley, director of the General Services Administration’s Alliant GWAC, said agencies should plan for this months before the fourth quarter arrives. When that’s not possible, it’s important to have strong relationships with internal contracting shops, as well as GWACs and other government buyers, he said.

Keep reading this article at: http://www.federaltimes.com/story/government/acquisition/2015/08/26/end–year-contracting/32414181/

Does perception matter? In federal contracting, it does

By

Perception is a funny thing. Most would agree that it’s based less on reality and more on assumptions – on believing what we’re told, on placing too much weight on one, often isolated situation, circumstance, or moment in time. And yet it persists. And it’s incredibly persuasive.

NCMA World Congress 2015And no, the fact that perception is often shaped by media is not lost on me. As both a producer and consumer of news, I recognize the responsibility placed upon journalists, fair or not, to dictate how an event, an issue, or an entire industry should be regarded.  It’s precisely why, in fact, I was fortunate enough to talk about how perception may or may not influence how federal contracting functions at the National Contract Management Association’s World Congress.

But as we noted during that panel, for the world of federal contracting, the perception comes from many other places beyond media.

Keep reading this article at: http://www.federaltimes.com/story/government/blogs/editorial/2015/07/29/does-perception-matter-federal-contracting-does/30830163/

 

How companies hide the spoils of winning government contracts

By

General Electric, the venerable maker of light bulbs, refrigerators, and other appliances, recently announced that it was selling off its consumer products division because the profit margins are too low. While GE bids that division goodbye, it’s holding onto its highly lucrative government-contracting business, in which a less-demanding customer leaves room for higher margins. Between 2007 and 2012, GE secured more than $16 billion worth of federal contracts, which might have something to do with the fact that it spent $150 million on lobbying during that period.

How often do these sorts of contracts roll in for companies that spend heavily on political advocacy? Unfortunately, there’s not enough public information to say.

Journalists and critics frequently bring up the dizzying totals that special interests put into elections—one estimate was that $3.7 billion was spent on last month’s midterms—but it’s much less common to hear about the impact of that money on the government’s decision-making.

Keep reading this article at: http://www.govexec.com/contracting/2014/12/how-companies-hide-spoils-winning-government-contracts/100572

Contracting News

Read More

Contracting Tips

Read More

GTPAC News

Read More

Georgia Tech News

Read More