Georgia Tech Procurement Assistance Center

Here are the Georgia businesses who won federal contracts in August 2018

By

Ever wonder who’s winning federal contracts in Georgia?
Wouldn’t this information be helpful if you are looking for subcontracting prospects?  Or when you’re trying to figure out who your competitors are?  Or when considering who might be a good partner on an upcoming bid proposal?

federal-contract-award-winners-in-georgiaEach and every month, the Georgia Tech Procurement Assistance Center (GTPAC) compiles and publishes a list of federal contracts awarded to Georgia businesses.  The list comes complete with point-of-contact information on the awardees, the name of the awarding agency, the dollar value of the contract, and much more.

Download details on the federal contract award winners in Georgia during AUGUST 2018 right here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – AUGUST 2018

Earlier months in the year are archived below:

Contract awardees in July 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – JULY 2018

Contract awardees in June 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – JUNE 2018

Contract awardees in May 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – MAY 2018

Contract awardees in April 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – APRIL 2018

Contract awardees in March 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – MARCH 2018

Contract awardees in February 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – FEBRUARY 2018

Contract awardees in January 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – JANUARY 2018

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2017, see: http://gtpac.org/2018/01/01/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2017

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2016, see: http://gtpac.org/2017/01/02/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2016

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2015, see: http://gtpac.org/2016/01/04/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2015

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2014, see: http://gtpac.org/2015/01/here-are-the-georgia-companies-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2014 

5 tips for making winning bids

By

After spending 30 years in the software business, Greg Mills was seeking a new challenge. That’s why two years ago, he acquired a brass and metal-fixtures manufacturer near Phoenix and renamed it M3 metals. He’s spent the majority of that time seeking ways to modernize and streamline the company, so it can find new customers in the increasingly competitive construction industry.

He isn’t alone. In fact, 34 percent of construction companies said their biggest challenge in their first through fourth years in business was finding new customers, according to a Kabbage® study. That’s more than the 30 percent combined who said they were most concerned with managing cash flow, dealing with regulations, and finding and retaining employees.

Keep reading this article at: https://www.constructiondive.com/news/5-tips-for-making-winning-bids/530192/

Small business advocate wins $475,000 in legal fees after 4-year fight with federal government

By

After four years and expenses of more than $700,000, a California-based small business advocate on Thursday won an agreement from the Justice and Defense departments to pay his legal fees for litigation forcing the government to release confidential contracting data.

Lloyd Chapman, the outspoken founder of the Petaluma-based American Small Business League, declared victory in what he called an “historic” move by Judge William Alsup of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to require the government to pay Chapman $475,000.

Neither Justice nor the Pentagon would comment on the case to Government Executive, but Chapman’s award was confirmed by his Washington attorney, Jon Cuneo of Cuneo, Gilbert & Laduca.

Keep reading this article at: https://www.govexec.com/contracting/2018/08/small-business-advocate-wins-475k-legal-fees-after-4-year-fight-government/150280/

Here are the Georgia businesses who won federal contracts in July 2018

By

Ever wonder who’s winning federal contracts in Georgia?
Wouldn’t this information be helpful if you are looking for subcontracting prospects?  Or when you’re trying to figure out who your competitors are?  Or when considering who might be a good partner on an upcoming bid proposal?

federal-contract-award-winners-in-georgiaEach and every month, the Georgia Tech Procurement Assistance Center (GTPAC) compiles and publishes a list of federal contracts awarded to Georgia businesses.  The list comes complete with point-of-contact information on the awardees, the name of the awarding agency, the dollar value of the contract, and much more.

Download details on the federal contract award winners in Georgia during JULY 2018 right here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – JULY 2018

Earlier months are archived below:

Contract awardees in June 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – JUNE 2018

Contract awardees in May 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – MAY 2018

Contract awardees in April 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – APRIL 2018

Contract awardees in March 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – MARCH 2018

Contract awardees in February 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – FEBRUARY 2018

Contract awardees in January 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – JANUARY 2018

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2017, see: http://gtpac.org/2018/01/01/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2017

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2016, see: http://gtpac.org/2017/01/02/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2016

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2015, see: http://gtpac.org/2016/01/04/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2015

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2014, see: http://gtpac.org/2015/01/here-are-the-georgia-companies-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2014 

Teaming agreement challenges for subcontractors

By

A recent Virginia Supreme Court case underscores the hurdles government subcontractors may face when they seek to enforce common teaming agreement terms (see: CGI Fed’l Inc. v. FCi Federal, Inc., No. 170617 (Va. June 7, 2018).

This case of the “disappearing workshare” also illustrates that strategic choices made during teaming agreement negotiations and in litigation may dictate whether the subcontractor has any recourse against the prime contractor.

In 2012, CGI signed a teaming agreement with FCi to jointly prepare a proposal for a State Department contract for which FCi would act as the prime contractor and CGI as the subcontractor.  FCi retained exclusive rights to finalize the proposal and negotiate any resulting prime contract with the government.   The teaming agreement said CGI “will receive” a 45% workshare of the awarded total contract value, but the “commitment may not be exactly 45% each year,” and it required the parties to enter into “good faith negotiations” for a subcontract after prime contract award.  If the parties could not mutually agree on a subcontract within 90 days after award, the teaming agreement would expire.

CGI and FCi worked together on the proposal for three months.   The government identified weaknesses in the proposal and invited a revised proposal.   CGI agreed to help FCi with the revised proposal if FCi committed to give CGI a 41% workshare and ten management positions on the resulting project.  The parties signed an amended teaming agreement with those new terms, but the other terms of the original teaming agreement did not change.  With CGI’s help, FCi prepared a revised proposal to the government.  

The government awarded the prime contract to FCi, but a competing bidder filed a series of protests.

Keep reading this article at: https://www.insidegovernmentcontracts.com/2018/07/teaming-agreement-challenges-subcontractors/

Waiting for the final government audit may be too late

By

In a case of first impression, a Court of Appeals has held that a government subcontractor’s claim for reimbursement of its actual indirect costs was time-barred.

Fluor Fed’l Solns. LLC v. PAE Applied Techs, LLC, No. 17-1468, 2018 WL 1768233 (4th Cir. Apr. 12, 2018) (per curiam) (unpublished).  It is the first case to directly address the interplay between the Allowable Cost and Payment Clause of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), 48 C.F.R. § 52.216-7, and a statute of limitations.  It highlights the risks government subcontractors face when they choose to wait for a Government audit rather than litigate promptly after a payment dispute arises.

This case involved a long-term subcontract and a long-delayed government audit.  In 2002, Fluor and PAE entered into a federal government subcontract that ultimately spanned a 15-year performance period. The subcontract incorporated, with minor changes, the FAR Allowable Cost and Payment Clause, 48 C.F.R. § 52.216-7, found in most cost-reimbursable federal government contracts and subcontracts. That clause requires the Government (or, in this case, the prime contractor, PAE), to pay Fluor’s “anticipated final” indirect rates in accordance with the contract terms, subject to retroactive adjustments once a government audit establishes the subcontractor’s final indirect rates applicable to the contract. 48 C.F.R. § 52.216-7(e)–7(g).

Keep reading this article at: https://www.insidegovernmentcontracts.com/2018/07/waiting-final-government-audit-may-late/

Here are the Georgia businesses who won federal contracts in June 2018

By

Ever wonder who’s winning federal contracts in Georgia?
Wouldn’t this information be helpful if you are looking for subcontracting prospects?  Or when you’re trying to figure out who your competitors are?  Or when considering who might be a good partner on an upcoming bid proposal?

federal-contract-award-winners-in-georgiaEach and every month, the Georgia Tech Procurement Assistance Center (GTPAC) compiles and publishes a list of federal contracts awarded to Georgia businesses.  The list comes complete with point-of-contact information on the awardees, the name of the awarding agency, the dollar value of the contract, and much more.

Download details on the federal contract award winners in Georgia during JUNE 2018 right here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – JUNE 2018

Contract awardees in May 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – MAY 2018

Contract awardees in April 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – APRIL 2018

Contract awardees in March 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – MARCH 2018

Contract awardees in February 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – FEBRUARY 2018

Contract awardees in January 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – JANUARY 2018

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2017, see: http://gtpac.org/2018/01/01/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2017

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2016, see: http://gtpac.org/2017/01/02/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2016

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2015, see: http://gtpac.org/2016/01/04/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2015

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2014, see: http://gtpac.org/2015/01/here-are-the-georgia-companies-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2014 

Congress aims to redefine ‘subcontract’

By

If an agreement qualifies as a “subcontract” under a government contract, then it may be subject to certain flow-down, compliance, and reporting requirements.  These requirements are intended to protect the government’s interests, and have significant ramifications for contractors, e.g., increasing transaction costs, expanding potential areas of exposure.

These compliance obligations and risks can even deter some companies from performing under government contracts, especially those companies offering commercial items.

Currently, there is no uniform definition of “subcontract” in the applicable procurement regulations or in the procurement chapters under Titles 10 and 41 of the U.S. Code.  Indeed, there are more than twenty varying definitions of “subcontract” in the FAR and DFARS, with many clauses failing to specify which definition applies.  Now Congress is looking to address this lack of uniformity through the FY 2019 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

Keep reading this article at: https://www.insidegovernmentcontracts.com/2018/06/congress-aims-to-redefine-the-subcontract/

DoD must work harder to include small business contractors, audit says

By

An audit of two Army Contracting Command centers in Redstone, Alabama and Warren, Michigan, revealed The Department of Defense (DoD) must increase its efforts in order to meet small business subcontracting goals.

The DoD Inspector General Audit was carried out in three different branches. One audit was performed on the Army, and two each on the Marine Corps and the Air Force. According to the audit, small businesses may have lost opportunities because protocols were not followed which could have encouraged more small businesses to be part of the federal marketplace.

Small businesses have been specifically included in the federal contract bidding process to both support and encourage growth in communities across the country. Head of the House Small Business Committee U.S. Rep. Sam Graves (R-Missouri) announced in Nov. 2017 his desire to raise the federal government’s contracting goal for small businesses to 25 percent, a two percent increase from the current 23 percent target for contracts to be awarded to small businesses today.

Keep reading this article at: https://smallbiztrends.com/2018/05/defense-contracts-for-small-businesses.html

Here are the Georgia businesses who won federal contracts in May 2018

By

Ever wonder who’s winning federal contracts in Georgia?
Wouldn’t this information be helpful if you are looking for subcontracting prospects?  Or when you’re trying to figure out who your competitors are?  Or when considering who might be a good partner on an upcoming bid proposal?

federal-contract-award-winners-in-georgiaEach and every month, the Georgia Tech Procurement Assistance Center (GTPAC) compiles and publishes a list of federal contracts awarded to Georgia businesses.  The list comes complete with point-of-contact information on the awardees, the name of the awarding agency, the dollar value of the contract, and much more.

Download details on the federal contract award winners in Georgia during MAY 2018 right here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – MAY 2018

Contract awardees in April 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – APRIL 2018

Contract awardees in March 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – MARCH 2018

Contract awardees in February 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – FEBRUARY 2018

Contract awardees in January 2018 are located here: FEDERAL CONTRACT AWARDS IN GEORGIA – JANUARY 2018

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2017, see: http://gtpac.org/2018/01/01/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2017

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2016, see: http://gtpac.org/2017/01/02/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2016

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2015, see: http://gtpac.org/2016/01/04/here-are-the-georgia-businesses-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2015

To see award winners in Calendar Year 2014, see: http://gtpac.org/2015/01/here-are-the-georgia-companies-who-won-federal-contracts-in-2014 

Contracting News

Read More

Contracting Tips

Read More

GTPAC News

Read More

Georgia Tech News

Read More