Georgia Tech Procurement Assistance Center

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Training
    • Class Registration
    • On-demand Training
    • Cybersecurity Video
    • Veterans Verification Video
    • GTPAC Community
    • Other Training Audio & Video
  • Useful Links
  • Team Directory
    • Albany Counselor
    • Athens Counselor
    • Atlanta Counselors
    • Augusta Counselor
    • Carrollton Counselor
    • Columbus Counselor
    • Gainesville Counselor
    • Savannah Counselor
    • Warner Robins Counselor
  • Directions
    • Athens
    • Atlanta – Training Facility
    • Atlanta – Office
    • Albany
    • Augusta
    • Carrollton
    • Columbus
    • Gainesville
    • Savannah
    • Warner Robins
  • New Client Application
  • Contact Us

Inspector general tells GSA to double-check contracts with e-tools

June 22, 2010 By ei2admin

The General Services Administration should rely more on electronic tools to reduce the number of mistakes and unauthorized approvals in its Multiple Award Schedule contracts, the agency’s inspector general said.

According to a report released this month, weaknesses in oversight of the contracting process at the Integrated Technology Services’ Center for Information Technology Schedules Program have led to errors in the award and modification of Multiple Award Schedule contracts. In fiscal 2009, the center was responsible for more than 5,400 MAS contracts worth more than $15 billion.

GSA has two applications that can check if contracts are following the proper procedures as they move through the many steps to award. The agency can use eOffer and eMod, which are Web-based systems that let vendors electronically submit contract offers and modifications. The inspector general found that GSA uses the applications in less than 30 percent of contracting actions.

The tools offer an automated, controlled process for completing contract documents not found in the paper-based process, the inspector general found. For example, vendors and contracting officers must review and digitally sign files in eOffer before the award process can move forward, which ensures that documents haven’t been overlooked. EMod, which feeds revisions back to GSA’s electronic procurement tools, will accept digital signatures only from the contracting officer and the vendor’s official negotiators, preventing unauthorized contract specialists from activating changes.

But auditors found contract specialists can input and change award information — and possibly introduce errors — without the approval of a contracting officer. GSA should integrate stronger access controls as it rolls out its systems modernization, which is scheduled for completion in fiscal 2015, the report concluded.

Larry Allen, president of the Coalition for Government Procurement, said inconsistencies in senior leadership and an increasing workload have affected management at the IT center. ITS Assistant Commissioner Ed O’Hare has asked for resources to address the problems, he added.

“The findings of this report aren’t necessarily solely indicative of rank-and-file people at the IT center not hitting their marks,” Allen said. Many contracting personnel aren’t comfortable with the new technologies, and more training will be required to familiarize them with the systems, he added.

“Part of the problem here is driven by past IG reports that have found problems but have not done a great job of offering explanations,” Allen said. “There’s some due diligence the IG needs to do in terms of the effects its findings have on behavior at the [IT center].”

In comments submitted to the inspector general, Federal Acquisition Service acting Commissioner Steve Kempf agreed with the report’s findings.

— by Emily Long – GovExec.com – 06/14/2010

Filed Under: Contracting News Tagged With: federal contracting, GSA, IG, Schedules

Recent Posts

  • The Navy gets tough on DFARS cybersecurity compliance
  • Wait! Wait! Don’t sign that!
  • Protégé subcontract revenues from mentor hold no basis for economic dependence
  • Are more FCA cases against small businesses on the horizon?
  • Big changes to the Buy American Act are coming—will they matter?

Popular Topics

8(a) abuse Army bid protest budget budget cuts certification construction contract awards contracting opportunities cybersecurity DoD DOJ False Claims Act FAR federal contracting federal contracts fraud GAO Georgia Tech government contracting government contract training government trends GSA GSA Schedule GTPAC HUBZone innovation IT Justice Dept. marketing NDAA OMB SBA SDVOSB set-aside small business small business goals spending subcontracting technology VA veteran owned business VOSB wosb

Contracting News

GSA takes next step towards consolidating multiple award schedules

OIG report: SBA’s all small mentor-protégé program falling short

Say goodbye to FedBizOpps!

SBA adjusts monetary-based size standards for inflation

DoD issues final rule restricting the use of LPTA procurements

Read More

Contracting Tips

The Navy gets tough on DFARS cybersecurity compliance

Wait! Wait! Don’t sign that!

Protégé subcontract revenues from mentor hold no basis for economic dependence

Are more FCA cases against small businesses on the horizon?

Big changes to the Buy American Act are coming—will they matter?

Read More

GTPAC News

SBA hosting access to capital forum Sept. 16th

Recent DoD contract awards (Aug. 15 – 28)

Georgia National Guard hosting Vendor Expo Day Nov. 14, 2019

GTPAC participates at National MBE Manufacturers Summit

Recent DoD contract awards (Aug. 6-14)

Read More

Georgia Tech News

President Cabrera’s First Week

Research, sponsored activity awards top $1 billion at Georgia Tech

Georgia Tech’s economic impact on Atlanta clocks in at $3.3B in 2018

Georgia Tech aerospace engineering graduate James McConville sworn in as Army’s top officer

Georgia Tech: A driver of economic development

Read More

  • SAM.gov registration is free, and help with SAM is free, too
APTAC RSS Twitter GTPAC - 30th Year of Service

Copyright © 2019 · Georgia Tech - Enterprise Innovation Institute