Georgia Tech Procurement Assistance Center

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Training
    • Class Registration
    • On-demand Training
    • GTPAC COVID-19 Resource Page
    • Cybersecurity Video
    • Veterans Verification Video
    • GTPAC Community
    • Other Training Audio & Video
  • Useful Links
  • Team Directory
    • Albany Counselor
    • Athens Counselor
    • Atlanta Counselors
    • Augusta Counselor
    • Carrollton Counselor
    • Columbus Counselor
    • Gainesville Counselor
    • Savannah Counselor
    • Warner Robins Counselor
  • Directions
    • Athens
    • Atlanta – Training Facility
    • Atlanta – Office
    • Albany
    • Augusta
    • Carrollton
    • Columbus
    • Gainesville
    • Savannah
    • Warner Robins
  • COVID-19
  • New Client Application
  • Contact Us

Builder sues city over bid dispute

May 5, 2010 By ei2admin

Another businessman who reached his boiling point over the city’s purchasing practices is suing Augusta’s government.

Tony Ammar filed suit in Richmond County Superior Court on April 14 on behalf of his company, Ammar Construction Co., against the city and its procurement director, Geri Sams.

The city notified Ammar on Sept. 3 that his company was the low bidder on a job to do repairs at the Henry Brigham Center.

Ammar said he started to prepare for the job, obtaining a performance bond — which cost $925 — and lining up workers.

Eight days after he was awarded the bid, Ammar received a letter from Sams that said his bid was deemed “noncompliant.”

Ammar appealed unsuccessfully to Sams, the administrative services committee and Augusta commissioners.

Several other businesses have contended in lawsuits that they’ve faced the same frustration with the city’s procurement practices, particularly over Augusta commissioners’ refusal to waive any violation of the “materiality provision.”

That provision, noted in every bid request, states that a proposal will be thrown out if any error is discovered. That includes everything from a signature in the wrong place to the inability to obtain bonding.

Ammar’s bid was thrown out because of the way he filled out a form that is supposed to be submitted by subcontractors. Ammar had no subcontractors, according to his lawsuit.

“The form, the ‘Subcontractor’s Affidavit,’ does not include any blank lines or other designated place for a general contractor to complete the information (when) there are no subcontractors,” the lawsuit contends.

The repair project was put out for bid again recently. The bid proposals are to be opened May 18; until then it won’t be known whether the city might have saved money by waiving the alleged error in Ammar’s proposal.

LATE LAST MONTH, the city won a federal court battle against three other businesses and the Association for Fair Government. In awarding the city summary judgment, U.S. District Court Judge J. Randal Hall wrote:

“The city should not interpret this decision as endorsing the quality of its procurement operations. In fact, the record in this case suggests otherwise. The court empathizes with the plaintiffs’ understandable frustration with the city’s poor administration of the procurement process.

“However, the court will not, in the words of the Supreme Court, ‘constitutionalize’ these disappointed bidder disputes when the law does not allow such action.”

Thompson Building Wrecking, CSRA Testing and Artistic Design challenged the city’s practices as inconsistent and applied unfairly. The lawsuit also alleged the city is needlessly spending millions of dollars by rejecting the lowest bids over technicalities.

Hall wrote, “The reasonable inference that may be drawn from the evidence is that the city sometimes enforces the materiality provision and sometimes does not. Sometimes the enforcement favors minority-owned companies, and sometimes it favors nonminority-owned companies. In other words, at worst, the city is inconsistent in its application of the materiality provision, regardless of race. The record does not evidence purposeful race discrimination or enforcement based upon any other impermissible purpose.”

Therefore, he found there was no constitutional violation. If there is any issue with due process, that should be decided under state law by a Georgia court, he wrote.

City officials are working on proposed changes to the procurement ordinance to address some aspects of the materiality provision, said Andrew MacKenzie, the acting city general counsel.

Details on providing a local vendor preference are being worked out by the commission’s administrative committee.

The procurement department staff has already taken steps to improve some of the required forms to simplify the paperwork, MacKenzie said. More changes are being worked on to reduce the amount of paperwork and the chance for errors, he said.

There is no question that state law allows a local government to waive technical errors, but Augusta commissioners have chosen not to do so for the sake of consistency, MacKenzie said.

“The balance is tough,” he said.

– by Sandy Hodson, Staff Writer – Wednesday, April 28, 2010 – The Augusta Chronicle  – Source URL: http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/government/2010-04-28/builder-sues-city-over-bid-dispute

Filed Under: Contracting News Tagged With: bid proposal, contract protests, government contracting, minority owned business, subcontracting

Recent Posts

  • DoD publishes long awaited interim rule on CMMC
  • GSA Region 4 OSDBU hosting small business webinar
  • GTPAC launches COVID-19 resource page
  • GDEcD seeks GA Manufacturers and Distributors that can help with critical health care supply needs related to COVID-19
  • Georgia DOAS to hold 4th Annual Georgia Procurement Conference April 21-23, 2020

Popular Topics

8(a) abuse Army bid protest budget budget cuts certification construction contract awards contracting opportunities cybersecurity DoD DOJ False Claims Act FAR federal contracting federal contracts fraud GAO Georgia Tech government contracting government contract training government trends GSA GSA Schedule GTPAC HUBZone innovation IT Justice Dept. marketing NDAA OMB SBA SDVOSB set-aside small business small business goals spending subcontracting technology VA veteran owned business VOSB wosb

Contracting News

DoD publishes long awaited interim rule on CMMC

Small business subcontracting for cloud computing gets easier

Long awaited changes to WOSB/EDWOSB regulations expected this summer

The CMMC has arrived: DoD publishes version 1.0 of its new cybersecurity framework

GSA keeping ‘on track’ with schedule consolidation

Read More

Contracting Tips

A guide to labor and employment obligations for federal contractors

Who pays for CMMC certification?

Other transaction agreements: Where does an unsuccessful bidder go?

Knowledge is power, if you know how to use it

EAJA provides relief to construction contractor for government’s bad actions

Read More

GTPAC News

GSA Region 4 OSDBU hosting small business webinar

GTPAC launches COVID-19 resource page

GDEcD seeks GA Manufacturers and Distributors that can help with critical health care supply needs related to COVID-19

Georgia DOAS to hold 4th Annual Georgia Procurement Conference April 21-23, 2020

MICC Fort Stewart hosting acquisition forecast open house on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2020

Read More

Georgia Tech News

Dr. Abdallah testifies on U.S. competitiveness, research, STEM pipeline at Congressional hearing

Georgia Tech’s Technology Square Phase III to include George Tower

Student surprises his teacher with Georgia Tech acceptance news

Georgia Tech Applied Research will support DHS information safeguarding effort

$25 million project will advance DNA-based archival data storage

Read More

  • SAM.gov registration is free, and help with SAM is free, too
APTAC RSS Twitter GTPAC - 30th Year of Service

Copyright © 2021 · Georgia Tech - Enterprise Innovation Institute