Georgia Tech Procurement Assistance Center

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Training
    • Class Registration
    • On-demand Training
    • GTPAC COVID-19 Resource Page
    • Veterans Verification Video
    • Other Training Audio & Video
  • Useful Links
  • Team Directory
    • Albany Counselor
    • Atlanta Counselors
    • Augusta Counselor
    • Carrollton Counselor
    • Columbus Counselor
    • Gainesville Counselor
    • Savannah Counselor
    • Warner Robins Counselor
  • Directions
    • Atlanta – Training Facility
    • Atlanta – Office
    • Albany
    • Augusta
    • Carrollton
    • Columbus
    • Gainesville
    • Savannah
    • Warner Robins
  • COVID-19
  • New Client Application
  • Contact Us

Committee to review gaps in contractor suspension and debarment

March 23, 2010 By ei2admin

By Robert Brodsky- govexec.com – March 17, 2010 – Federal agencies have failed repeatedly to comply with suspension and debarment regulations, allowing poor performing and unethical companies to continue winning government work, according to a key congressional panel.

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will hold a hearing on Thursday morning to examine three recent inspector general reports that found agencies had suspended or debarred far too few deficient contractors and that officials often disregarded rules in favor of other administrative remedies.

For example, between 2004 and 2008, the Homeland Security Department had only 10 debarment cases. But the department’s IG found at least 23 other instances where officials terminated contracts for default or cause, but never reviewed the incidents to determine whether suspension or debarment referrals were warranted.

The February report noted DHS has suspension and debarment policies in place but is reluctant to follow them.

“Department procurement officials characterized the suspension and debarment process as being too resource intensive [and] punitive, and as negatively impacting the size of the contractor pool,” the IG noted.

The watchdog said agencies’ reluctance to pursue suspension and debarment could result in increased costs to taxpayers.

Inadequate contractors also appear to be slipping by at the U.S. Agency for International Development, which took only nine suspension and debarment actions between 2003 and 2007, accounting for less than 2 percent of its contract and grant awards, according to an October 2009 report by the agency’s IG.

When USAID did take debarment actions, officials often sent final notifications months late or not at all, and they failed to enter information into the government’s Excluded Parties List System database, according to the report.

Meanwhile, the Transportation Department’s inspector general reported in January that state officials likely awarded Recovery Act funds to an ineligible contractor.

In September 2008, the IG recommended the Federal Highway Administration suspend several companies and individuals who had been indicted in a bribery case. About 10 months after the initial referral, the agency suspended several individuals, although it did not punish their respective companies. In the meantime, officials in Kentucky awarded those businesses $24 million in stimulus contracts.

On average, Transportation takes 300 days to reach a suspension decision and more than 400 days to decide a debarment case, the IG found. Transportation guidelines, established in 2005, set a 45-day deadline for making such determinations.

The IG found Transportation officials have an unnecessarily high evidentiary threshold in suspension cases. While agency rules state an indictment or conviction is sufficient, officials often performed additional time-consuming tasks such as gathering information and conducting research not required by department policy, the report said.

Problems following suspension and debarment rules are not new. In February 2009, the Government Accountability Office found that in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007, agencies awarded more than two dozen contracts to businesses or individuals who at the time were under federal suspension or debarment.

The three IGs are scheduled to testify during Thursday’s hearing, as are senior management officials representing each of the agencies.

——————————————————————————–
(C) 2010 BY NATIONAL JOURNAL GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Filed Under: Contracting News Tagged With: debarment, GAO, government contracting, IG

Recent Posts

  • OMB releases guidance related to small business goals
  • Are verbal agreements good enough for government contractors?
  • OMB issues guidance on impact of injunction on government contractor vaccine mandate
  • CMMC 2.0 simplifies requirements but raises risks for government contractors
  • OFCCP launches contractor portal initiating AAP verification program

Popular Topics

8(a) abuse Army bid protest budget budget cuts certification construction contract awards contracting opportunities cybersecurity DoD DOJ False Claims Act FAR federal contracting federal contracts fraud GAO Georgia Tech government contracting government contract training government trends GSA GSA Schedule GTPAC HUBZone innovation IT Justice Dept. marketing NDAA OMB SBA SDVOSB set-aside small business small business goals spending subcontracting technology VA veteran owned business VOSB wosb

Contracting News

OMB releases guidance related to small business goals

OMB issues guidance on impact of injunction on government contractor vaccine mandate

Changes coming to DOD’s Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification under CMMC 2.0

Judge issues nationwide injunction halting enforcement of COVID-19 vaccine mandate

Nondisplacement of qualified workers is back, but with changes

Read More

Contracting Tips

Are verbal agreements good enough for government contractors?

CMMC 2.0 simplifies requirements but raises risks for government contractors

OFCCP launches contractor portal initiating AAP verification program

GAO rules that DoD may not require small business Joint Venture itself hold facility security clearance

Terminations for convenience clauses vs. mutual termination clauses

Read More

GTPAC News

VA direct access program events in 2022

Sandia National Laboratories seeks small business suppliers

Navy OSBP hosting DCAA overview (part 2) event Jan. 12, 2022

Navy OSBP hosting cybersecurity “ask me anything” event Dec. 16th

State of Georgia hosting supplier systems training on January 26, 2022

Read More

Georgia Tech News

Undergraduate enrollment growth reflects inclusive excellence

Georgia Tech delivers $4 billion in economic impact to the State of Georgia

Georgia Tech awards first round of seed grants to support team-based research

Georgia Tech announces inaugural Associate Vice President of Corporate Engagement

DoD funds Georgia Tech to enhance U.S. hypersonics capabilities

Read More

  • SAM.gov registration is free, and help with SAM is free, too
APTAC RSS Twitter GTPAC - 30th Year of Service

Copyright © 2022 · Georgia Tech - Enterprise Innovation Institute