Georgia Tech Procurement Assistance Center

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Training
    • Class Registration
    • On-demand Training
    • GTPAC COVID-19 Resource Page
    • Cybersecurity
    • Veterans Verification Video
    • GTPAC Community
    • Other Training Audio & Video
  • Useful Links
  • Team Directory
    • Albany Counselor
    • Atlanta Counselors
    • Augusta Counselor
    • Carrollton Counselor
    • Columbus Counselor
    • Gainesville Counselor
    • Savannah Counselor
    • Warner Robins Counselor
  • Directions
    • Atlanta – Training Facility
    • Atlanta – Office
    • Albany
    • Augusta
    • Carrollton
    • Columbus
    • Gainesville
    • Savannah
    • Warner Robins
  • COVID-19
  • New Client Application
  • Contact Us

Congressional panel seeks broad Defense acquisition overhaul

March 18, 2010 By ei2admin

By Robert Brodsky – March 11, 2010 – GovExec.com

A congressional panel that has spent the past year studying deficiencies in the Defense Department’s procurement system has recommended the department do a better job of defining acquisition requirements and monitoring contract performance.
“While the nature of Defense acquisition has substantially changed, the Defense acquisition system has not kept pace,” the Defense Acquisition Reform panel’s 49-page March 4 interim report stated. “The system remains structured primarily for the acquisition of weapon systems at a time when services represent a much larger share of the department’s acquisitions.”
The panel, which the House Armed Services Committee established in March 2009 to carry out a comprehensive review of the defense acquisition system, found that the shift to service-based contracting has led to challenges in outlining requirements, setting measurable and performance-based goals and overseeing contractor performance. Agencies spent $200 billion on service contracts in fiscal 2009.
To reform the system, the report recommended that Defense re-examine its guidance on service contracting and establish clear lines of authority for setting acquisition requirements. The group also said Defense must differentiate between information technology acquisition processes and other parts of the procurement system.

The panel deemed the department’s performance on weapon systems acquisition “unacceptable.” In 2009, the Government Accountability Office reported that 96 major Defense weapons programs experienced $296 billion in total cost growth and an average of 22 months in schedule delays.
“Even in the acquisition of weapon systems, the department’s historical strength, the system continues to generate development time frames for major systems measured in decades, an approach which has resulted in unacceptable cost growth, negative effects on industry, and in too many cases, a failure to meet warfighter needs,” Rep. Rob Andrews, D-N.J., the panel’s chairman, said in a statement prepared for the group’s final hearing on Thursday.
Another major problem, the panel found, is the absence of a performance management structure that can objectively determine the value being delivered to the warfighter and taxpayers.
The report recommended that Defense’s new Office of Performance Assessment and Root Cause Analysis track whether organizations throughout the defense acquisition system meet prenegotiated performance goals. Bonuses and potential promotions could provide incentives for doing a better job, according to the report.

“The intent of the performance metrics and performance management recommendations in this report is not to create new layers of bureaucracy,” the group noted. “If the performance management measures envisioned in the panel’s recommendations are implemented properly, program managers could be freed from certain reporting responsibilities specific to their individual program.”
But in his prepared statements for Thursday’s hearing, the department’s top acquisition official questioned whether the plan was feasible.
Ashton B. Carter, undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, said the PARCA office did not yet have the staffing or capability to conduct the type of performance assessments the panel suggested.
“I am concerned that adding a vast new domain of application to the PARCA portfolio — as this panel suggests — will complicate and delay that effort,” Carter testified.
The panel also recommended that Defense:
• Require workforce certification and mandatory continuing education for the acquisition workforce;
• Improve its financial management and audit readiness, or risk losing congressional funds;
• Proactively notify small businesses of contract solicitations rather than relying on firms to find those notifications on FedBizOpps;
• Repeal a rule that allows agencies to withhold 3 percent of contract payments in anticipation of taxes owed to the Treasury Department;
• Identify contractors and grantees with serious tax delinquencies and include that information in databases relating to past performance and contractor integrity;
• Review and implement recommendations, once they are completed, of an ongoing GAO study of the costs of contracting with firms with questionable employment practices;
• Shift the responsibility for certification of contractor business systems to independent teams within or outside of the Defense Contract Audit Agency.
Industry supported most of the suggestions. “The panel’s report contains a number of common-sense recommendations and reinforces commonly understood constraints on the defense acquisition system — ranging from the requirements identification and definition process to the inappropriate use of rigid rules for selecting contract types to the limitations facing the defense acquisition workforce,” said Stan Soloway, president and chief executive officer of Professional Services Council, a contractor trade association.
PSC argued, however, that since GAO’s contractor employment report has not been released or publicly vetted, it would be inappropriate to implement those yet-unknown recommendations.
The panel’s final report, which will incorporate input from various stakeholders, including Defense officials, will be released in two weeks, Andrews said. Many of its final recommendations will be addressed in the House Armed Services Committee’s version of the fiscal 2011 National Defense Authorization Act.

________________________________________
(C) 2010 BY NATIONAL JOURNAL GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Filed Under: Contracting News Tagged With: federal contracting, procurement reform, small business

Recent Posts

  • Georgia Tech creates new Office of Corporate Engagement
  • Federal contractor indicted for stealing over $1.2 million from the U.S. Postal Service
  • SBA hosting “Contract Bonds and Surety Bond Guarantee” webinar April 20th
  • GSA hosting “Getting on the GSA Schedule” webinar April 13th
  • NIH hosting 2021 small business program conference April 26-30th

Popular Topics

8(a) abuse Army bid protest budget budget cuts certification construction contract awards contracting opportunities cybersecurity DoD DOJ False Claims Act FAR federal contracting federal contracts fraud GAO Georgia Tech government contracting government contract training government trends GSA GSA Schedule GTPAC HUBZone innovation IT Justice Dept. marketing NDAA OMB SBA SDVOSB set-aside small business small business goals spending subcontracting technology VA veteran owned business VOSB wosb

Contracting News

Federal contractor indicted for stealing over $1.2 million from the U.S. Postal Service

CMMC announces new advisory council to collect industry feedback

EEOC announces April 26 opening date for the collection of 2019 and 2020 EEO-1 component 1 data

Contractors line up to rebuild MARTA’s Five Points Station

GDOT announces $828.8 million in projects to transform Ga. 316

Read More

Contracting Tips

A whole new marketplace: GSA’s “commercial platforms” initiative

CRS Reports: Mentor-Protégé programs and small business size standards

CRS Report: Small businesses and COVID-19, relief and assistance resources

How do I find out what the government is buying?

Past performance isn’t always a required evaluation factor, says GAO

Read More

GTPAC News

SBA hosting “Contract Bonds and Surety Bond Guarantee” webinar April 20th

GSA hosting “Getting on the GSA Schedule” webinar April 13th

NIH hosting 2021 small business program conference April 26-30th

Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency hosting industry day and matchmaking May 6th and 20th

Missile Defense Agency hosting virtual conference May 11-13th

Read More

Georgia Tech News

Georgia Tech creates new Office of Corporate Engagement

Delta Jacket wins 2021 Georgia Tech InVenture prize

Future of 5G is under the microscope at Georgia incubator

Collective worm and robot “blobs” protect individuals, swarm together

The Partnership for Inclusive Innovation is now accepting applications for pilot programs

Read More

  • SAM.gov registration is free, and help with SAM is free, too
APTAC RSS Twitter GTPAC - 30th Year of Service

Copyright © 2021 · Georgia Tech - Enterprise Innovation Institute